Quantised Inertia (QI) is a very powerful, yet incomplete Scientific theory by Mike McCulloch (@memcculloch). In this blog post, I will, in layman's terms, extend QI with a very small and reasonable set of axioms I believe are implied by QI, yet ignored by the founder of QI as ways forward to better quantify anomalies explained, and lock down scientific inputs to engineering.
1) There is no such thing as "Linear Momentum" What we perceive as linear momentum on Earth is actually angular momentum with very large radii. We are in a privileged acceleration situation on the surface of the Earth, where completely inelastic collisions in a linear sense can seem to happen because of the essentially infinite angular momentum of the Earth damping any residual angular momentum to its surface angular velocity, giving the impression of an "inertial frame" see 2.
<Since acceleration cannot be zero, masses cannot travel in a cosmic straight line, and thus have a minimum arc in all three dimensions - via QI's idea of minimum accelerations.>
2) There is no such thing as an "inertial frame of reference". Acceleration cannot be zero in any axis *nor at any physical point in the cosmos*. This leads to a conundrum, however. A large, but completely solid object, that is nominally in a low cosmic acceleration environment, rotates slowly. There are physical points within the solid that nominally would be in acceleration equilibrium cosmically, but the minimum acceleration laws apply. This is incompatible with a cold solid. There is no "near minimum acceleration" points anywhere we can place a solid into to test.
3) For minimum acceleration laws, it is the actual net cosmic acceleration on the mass in question having to be a minimum value. For instance, within the space station, although gravitational acceleration balances the centrifugal force, the whole of the space station is still in the privileged cosmic acceleration required to stay in orbit. Artificial satellites damp relative angular momentum by their 3 axis reaction wheels and similar.
4) Thrust should not be considered a linear force. Since neither inertia nor momentum is linear in nature, "equal and opposite reaction" is completely an angular momentum exchange. Thus what can be interpreted as a linear thrust that violates the linear conservation of momentum, should instead be interpreted as a balanced exchange of angular momentum that conveniently obtains a relative acceleration in a desired direction without the direct expelling of mass to achieve.
5) Concepts such as "position", "velocity", "acceleration", "mass" and "energy" are not fundamental but derivatives (actually integrals or sums) of information, which of itself has the property being conserved, but also being summed and added to which derives time. Thus the uncertainty principle really is a combined principle of the conservation of information, and the additive nature of information in the forward direction of time.
6) Information integrates to other nominally conserved quantities by the following process. The unit of information is the qubit. Each qubit is represented by a point of the surface area of the Bloch sphere - In the Universe's case this is the CMB. Each qubit is holographically translated/mapped to the volume inside the sphere, which is the visible universe. The qubit is the mirror particle to what we perceive as the smallest unit of mass at the neutrino scale. The neutrino and the CMB mirror are quantum entangled - everything in between is the observable universe that thus has laws that stay uniform through every part of that. (HT to @marnisheppeard, physicist missing in New Zealand)
7) In the mapping of the qubit to the volume of the universe, it is the spin of the neutrino which derives the mass/energy from the qubit of information. The minimal acceleration derives both the direction of time, our expanding universe, the uncertainty principle. The forward direction of time is the direction of new information due to minimum acceleration. New information means an expanding Bloch sphere and thus expanding visible universe. The uncertainty principle is the randomness of which axis the acceleration is going to add on to any component neutrino.
8) Component spinning neutrinos "fuse" additively to make up all known fundamental particles. The associahedra in general and the permutohedron specifically are important shapes to consider that build hadrons from fused subatomic particles, which themselves are fusions of neutrinos.
9) The most fundamental conserved quantity in the universe is angular momentum. It is the sum of all of the angular momenta of all component information, and can only get bigger over time, but by only one qubit at a time. It is essentially the centripetal acceleration of the spin, which integrates to velocity, and then position. Mass is the 3 axis stabilised sum of information in the accelerating frame of reference of the body representing the mass, and gravity is just the quantum entanglement of the masses as they add up over time and integrate to a different relative position to the masses it still is quantum entangled to.
10) Mass/Energy/ is not conserved precisely over time. It increases at a steady quantised rate in a random axis (1 of 3)
11) With QI, a Universe of continuous creation is possible (rather than big bang theory) due to the re-interpretation of the CMB, and a viable mechanism for mass/energy/information to add up over time evenly over the universe, but mainly concentrated in the hearts of massy bodies that conserve the information within a locally integrated position.
