Saturday, August 13, 2005
Pax Americana vs alternatives
Dr. Clam has claimed in the past that the Pax Americana is the only show in town, and at some level that is true. However since the end of MAD, both the US and the UN have been artificially raised in stature and influence. I don't think it's about US vs UN as which is going to have primacy. They will both coexist and have certain specialties for generations to come. So much for the Pax UN - what about the Pax EU,or the Pax Islam, or the Pax China. Each sphere of influence will continue to exist indefinitely, with just the rules of co-existense to be fought over. This is where Pax Australiana comes in. We have a nice sphere of influence in the Pacific, and we are very well connected with the Pax Americana and the Pax China: and because of our free trade, we have generally good international connections with everybody. In the future Australia will have influence disproportionate to our GDP or population, mainly due to good overall policy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
'Continue to exist indefinitely?' Pish, tosh. I give the EU and the UN 50:50 chances of lasting out the next decade.
And whatever is going on in Dar-al-Islam, it sure isn't 'Pax' anything...
Post a Comment